What we’ve proven, and what’s next
Miromar separates evidence from estimates. Laboratory measurements support the numerical model at TRL 3. The next step is to measure the complete system at full scale.
The development programme answers one engineering question at a time. Modelling establishes expected behaviour. Flume experiments test the model against measured motion. The 2027 prototype moves from a validated model to a complete, full-scale machine.
A representative site trial follows only after the prototype is measured. The first pilot then places the system with an infrastructure partner under real operating constraints.
- Completed
Model and simulation
Numerical model and eight-hydrofoil canal simulation.
- Completed
Lab validation, TRL 3
Numerical model validated against flume experiments.
- 2027
Full-scale prototype
Build and measure the full-scale system.
- Next
Site trial
Test in a representative channel.
- Next
First pilot
Operate with an infrastructure partner.
Questions and answers
Is the technology working today?
The numerical model has been validated against flume experiments at TRL 3. A full-scale prototype is planned for 2027.
Why not a conventional turbine?
A round rotor is limited by channel depth. A hydrofoil array uses the width. Measuring that difference at full scale is the goal of the 2027 prototype.
What about fish and navigation?
Fish passage, ecology and navigation are assessed for each site. Miromar does not make environmental claims without site-specific evidence.
Why canals before tides?
Irrigation canals have managed flow and accessible sites. Tidal channels use larger bidirectional modules.
How does it scale?
Modules form arrays. The tidal module estimate is 30–50 kW; that figure is a design estimate, not measured output.